Polycentrism and Gargantua
Peter J. Boettke
Director, F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and EconomicsChristopher Coyne
Associate Director, F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and EconomicsPeter Leeson
Senior Fellow, F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics
Read the full article at SSRN.com.
How should governments publicly provide goods and services? One option is to do so polycentrically – through multiple, autonomous, local decision-making centers. Alternatively governments may organize public good provision monocentrically – through a singular, centralized, higher-level decision-making center. We call the former arrangement “polycentrism” and the latter one “gargantua.” This paper investigates the costs and benefits of polycentrism and gargantua. We argue that polycentrism is superior. Polycentric provision permits localities to discover and deploy the efficient scale of public good provision, small or large. Gargantua precludes small-scale provision as an option even when it’s efficient. To investigate our argument we consider governments’ consolidation of public education in the United States.
When Will Magical Economic Thinking from Biden and Co. End? | Creators
Veronique de Rugy