This paper argues that Mises's methodological position has been misunderstood by both friends and foes alike.
This paper argues that Mises’s methodological position has been misunderstood by both friends and foes alike. On the one hand, Mises’s critics wrongly characterize his position as rejecting empirical work. On the other hand, his defenders wrongly interpret his stance as rejecting empirical analyses on the grounds that they contradict apriorism and push economics towards historicism. We show that Mises’s methodological position occupies a unique place that is at once both wholly aprioristic and radically empirical.
Read the full article at SSRN.com.
Citation (Chicago Style)
Boettke, Peter J. and Leeson, Peter T., Was Mises Right? (2006). Review of Social Economy, Vol. 64, No. 2, June 2006.
To speak with a scholar or learn more on this topic, visit our contact page.